rjmccall added a comment. Hmm. I think "v-tables are in the address space of the object pointer" is not a good assumption. Probably this ought to be determined by the C++ ABI for the target. In principle it could even be class-specific, but I think we can start by assuming it's universal.
It should be decided by the AST-level ABI abstraction so that it properly affects record layout, since different address spaces can have different pointer sizes. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D103835/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D103835 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
