curdeius accepted this revision. curdeius added a comment. In D106112#2885604 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D106112#2885604>, @owenpan wrote:
> I just reviewed the differences between K&R C (circa 1978) and ANSI/ISO C > again and didn't see anything else that would impact clang-format, so a new > Standard enum value for C78 is not needed. Nevertheless, we can add a boolean > option e.g. C78ParameterDecl in the future if this patch causes regressions > for some users. WDYT? Sounds reasonable. Any way, you can go forward and land this patch. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D106112/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D106112 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
