HazardyKnusperkeks added a comment. In D106112#2883301 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D106112#2883301>, @curdeius wrote:
> Looks okay, but I was wondering if we don't want to guard all K&R-related > changes behind e.g. ```Standard: Cpp78``, so as not to possibly introduce > strange bugs in newer modes. > It may be an overkill if there are 2 patches like this, but if there are > more, that might become sensible to do so. > WDYT? I think this would be reasonable. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D106112/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D106112 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
