stuart added a comment.

On reflection, I don't think it makes sense to make use of 
DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_17 or DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_20 in Clang just yet, as these 
are generally not supported by other tooling. I am a bit confused by DWARF 
publishing these tags ahead of time, yet tooling having not been updated to 
recognize them. Regardless, it is clear that support in debuggers needs to come 
first, which is something that I am not planning to add.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D104118/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D104118

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to