HazardyKnusperkeks added a comment. In D99031#2640425 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99031#2640425>, @aybassiouny wrote:
>> How about verifyFormat? Would that fail without your patch? > > @HazardyKnusperkeks sorry, but not sure that I understand your point. Are you > suggesting to use verifyFormat in my UT instead of EXPECT_EQ? I'm pretty sure @MyDeveloperDay would ask for that. I would maybe use both. But what it really interesting for me if verifyFormat would fail, i.e. would clang-format misformat something previously correctly formatted. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D99031/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D99031 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
