alokmishra.besu added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTBitCodes.h:1952
-      STMT_MS_DEPENDENT_EXISTS,   // MSDependentExistsStmt
-      EXPR_LAMBDA,                // LambdaExpr
       STMT_COROUTINE_BODY,
----------------
jdoerfert wrote:
> alokmishra.besu wrote:
> > jdoerfert wrote:
> > > Unrelated.
> > Only STMT_OMP_META_DIRECTIVE was added. Rest was formatted by git 
> > clang-format
> > Rest was formatted by git clang-format
> 
> Please don't format unrelated code. 
Removed.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Parse/ParseOpenMP.cpp:2264
+          Actions.StartOpenMPDSABlock(DirKind, DirName, Actions.getCurScope(),
+                                      Loc);
+          int paren = 0;
----------------
jdoerfert wrote:
> alokmishra.besu wrote:
> > jdoerfert wrote:
> > > Should we not go back to the original code handling "directives" instead? 
> > > This looks like it is copied here.
> > Unfortunately we cannot go to the original code handling since the original 
> > code handling assumes that the directive always ends with 
> > annot_pragma_openmp_end, while here it will always end with ')'.
> > In specification 5.0, since we are choosing only 1 directive, the body of 
> > the while block remains the same as the original code. Only the condition 
> > of the while block changes. In specification 5.1, we will need to generate 
> > code for dynamic handling and even the body will differ as we might need to 
> > generate AST node for multiple directives. It is best if we handle this 
> > code here for easier handling of 5.1 code, than in the original code space.
> > I will add a TODO comment here.
> > Unfortunately we cannot go to the original code handling since the original 
> > code handling assumes that the directive always ends with 
> > annot_pragma_openmp_end, while here it will always end with ')'.
> 
> Let's add a flag to the original handling to make this possible then. Copying 
> it is going to create more long term problems.
Done.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D91944/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D91944

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to