alokmishra.besu added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/StmtOpenMP.h:373
+///
+class OMPMetaDirective final : public OMPExecutableDirective {
+ friend class ASTStmtReader;
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> I think, metadirective should be a kind of a container for different
> sub-directives. The problem is that that subdirectives could be completely
> different, they may capture different variables, using different capture kind
> (by value or by reference) etc.So, you need to generate each possible
> sub-directive independently and store them in the meta directive node.
> Otherwise you won't be able to generate the code correctly.
In OpenMP 5.0, we do not need to generate every sub-directive. Rather we need
to select one (or none) directive and replace metadirective with it. So this is
not needed.
Yes with future specifications we will need to include a list of all valid
directives which need to be resolved at runtime. That is when we will need to
generate and store multiple sub-directives inside the OMPMetaDirective class.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D91944/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D91944
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
