nickdesaulniers planned changes to this revision. nickdesaulniers added inline comments.
================ Comment at: llvm/docs/LangRef.rst:1829 + + If a function with the ``nossp`` attribute calls a callee function that has + a stack protector function attribute, such as ``ssp``, ``sspreq``, or ---------------- void wrote: > Do we care about the opposite situation where a function requiring a stack > protector doesn't inline a function with the `nossp` attribute? oh, shoot, you're right. I should have thought of that case. I need to address that in this patch. Ok, let me add more tests/code/docs for that. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D87956/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D87956 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
