ldionne accepted this revision as: libc++.
ldionne added a comment.
I'll go ahead and ship this even though I know it will cause problems on GCC.
================
Comment at: libcxx/include/new:243
# ifdef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_BUILTIN_OVERLOADED_OPERATOR_NEW_DELETE
return ::operator new(__size, __align_val);
# else
----------------
jwakely wrote:
> ldionne wrote:
> > This breaks GCC (as of GCC 9). I don't know what mechanism GCC uses to tie
> > into constexpr allocation, so I don't know what the fix is.
> >
> > @jwakely Can you throw some hints at me?
> GCC 9 doesn't support constexpr allocation at all.
Does GCC 10 support it?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68364/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68364
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
