steakhal marked 2 inline comments as done.
steakhal added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Analysis/eval-predefined-exprs.cpp:1
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 --std=c++17
-analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection -verify %s
+
----------------
Szelethus wrote:
> Isn't it `-std=c++17`?
Thanks, typo.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Analysis/eval-predefined-exprs.cpp:7-21
+ clang_analyzer_dump(__func__);
+ clang_analyzer_dump(__FUNCTION__);
+ clang_analyzer_dump(__PRETTY_FUNCTION__);
+ // expected-warning@-3 {{&Element{"func",0 S64b,char}}}
+ // expected-warning@-3 {{&Element{"func",0 S64b,char}}}
+ // expected-warning@-3 {{&Element{"void func(U) [T = Class, Value = 42, U =
char]",0 S64b,char}}}
+}
----------------
Szelethus wrote:
> Why not put the expected warning right below the function call?
That would seriously violate the column limit.
This way it is easier to see and validate the pattern IMO.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D87004/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D87004
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
