guiand added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/MemorySanitizer.cpp:3573
+ case LibFunc_atomic_load:
+ if (!isa<CallInst>(CB)) {
+ llvm::errs() << "MSAN -- cannot instrument invoke of libatomic load."
----------------
eugenis wrote:
> Probably need the same check for atomic_store.
Although it would be good for consistency I don't think it's strictly needed
since with `atomic_store` we don't need to use `getNextNode()`
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D85559/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D85559
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
