dyung added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18708#390132, @rsmith wrote:
> What's the motivation for this change? Clang's C11 mode should accept all > code accepted by its C99 mode (and conversely, most or perhaps all of the C11 > language features are accepted by default in C99 mode as an extension). Is > the problem the C11 standard library extensions? From my understanding, there are 2 issues that block us. The first is that we currently do not ship all of the header files for C11. The second is that we do not yet fully have C11 library support yet for our platform. http://reviews.llvm.org/D18708 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
