hctim added a comment. In D82249#2105036 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D82249#2105036>, @arsenm wrote:
> Is the fallback not working correctly in this case for some reason? I'm fairly sure that G_GLOBAL_VALUE used to fallback onto SelectionDAGISel, and that was changed in D78465 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78465>. Because we only implemented the custom `adrp+movk` lowering in SelectionDAGISel, making that instruction sequence no longer fallback, so we don't get our proper lowering for HWASan globals. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D82249/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D82249 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
