martong added a comment. In D77125#1955245 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D77125#1955245>, @baloghadamsoftware wrote:
> In D77125#1952769 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D77125#1952769>, @martong wrote: > > > It seems like we could model here `emplace` and `emplace_after` exactly the > > same way we do with `insert` and `insert_after`, couldn't we? Perhaps that > > could go into this patch too. > > > They are already in this patch (see the tests and the `CallDescriptionMap`), > but they share their handing function with `insert` and `insert_after`. Ok, I missed that. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77125/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77125 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
