baloghadamsoftware added a comment. In D77125#1952769 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D77125#1952769>, @martong wrote:
> It seems like we could model here `emplace` and `emplace_after` exactly the > same way we do with `insert` and `insert_after`, couldn't we? Perhaps that > could go into this patch too. They are already in this patch (see the tests and the `CallDescriptionMap`), but they share their handing function with `insert` and `insert_after`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D77125/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D77125 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
