NoQ added a comment. Thanks!! I also recommend a more direct test with `-analyzer-display-progress | FileCheck`.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend/AnalysisConsumer.cpp:507-508 + // Skip analysis of inherited constructors as top-level functions because we + // cannot model the parameters. + // ---------------- That's probably the last reason why we should skip them :) I think we should focus on how these constructors don't even have a body written down in the code, so even if we find a bug, we won't be able to display it. We might as well find the bug in the inherited constructors (also /~~inherited~~/inheriting/ in your comment). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D75678/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D75678 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
