On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:32 PM Tim Northover via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 9 March 2016 at 13:20, David Blaikie via cfe-commits > <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > If we are touching these tests at all, as a cleanup, why aren't we > adjusting > > them to not pass through the llvm optimizers/code generators at all? > > Generally we are pretty clear that any test in Clang looking at llvms > > generated assembly is an anachronism to be removed eventually > > This patch should remove all checking (and generation) of assembly. > But as I said, I think banning all optimizations is going too far and > leads to unreadable tests (with excess loads and stores being a > particular problem). > > I still think we should avoid the optimizer, but as (at least) an intermediate step this seemed like a good compromise. -eric
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
