Charusso accepted this revision. Charusso added a comment. > ! In D75271#1896223 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75271#1896223>, @Szelethus > wrote: > Thinking back, I did have a number of failed attempts to make something a > bit less ugly, but the sharp divide between the 2 libraries makes is > really-really difficult, and I don't recall alternative solutions being that > much better. Either the checker interface gets worse, or the checker > registration interface gets so messy that it would severely hurt further > improvements in terms of checker dependency development.
Well, if you cannot solve this problem, most likely we neither, but keep in mind: > If you can't solve a problem, then there is an easier problem you can't > solve: find it. - George Polya --- As far as you guys keep updating your API I will buy it, thanks! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D75271/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D75271 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
