erichkeane added a comment. In D73967#1862268 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D73967#1862268>, @rsmith wrote:
> We allow _Complex T for integral types T in general, so this seems > inconsistent. Are there problems supporting this? Is it just a parser > limitation or something deeper? If there's some reason it doesn't naturally > work (as there is for at least non-power-of-two-sized integers in vectors) > then rejecting it seems fine. At the moment it doesn't work because of parsing. I'm unaware of there is a deeper limitation, but I'll look at it. I was unaware that we allow integral types for _Complex, I'd looked it up on cppreference and only saw the FP types so I was basically just confused as to what your intent was. I'll look closer now that I've done the _Atomic limitations. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D73967/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D73967 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
