rsmith added a comment. In D73967#1861757 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D73967#1861757>, @erichkeane wrote:
> Extended-vector types don't really make sense for non-powers-of-two (plus > have some odd gotchas when it comes to vectors of i1 for example), so I've > added a test that shows that this is rejected. OK, that seems fine to me. > _Complex _ExtInt(N) is rejected when parsing _Complex. It doesn't seem to > make sense to me to support them, so I've added a test that shows it is > invalid. Do you disagree? We allow _Complex T for integral types T in general, so this seems inconsistent. Are there problems supporting this? Is it just a parser limitation or something deeper? If there's some reason it doesn't naturally work (as there is for at least non-power-of-two-sized integers in vectors) then rejecting it seems fine. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D73967/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D73967 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
