xazax.hun added a comment. Since we went with the twine solution, I think we can get rid of the reverse stuff.
Note that: Twine should be used like: (Twine(A) + B + C).str() So the operator+ has twine as one of the operands. Once these are fixed, it looks good to me. Do you have commit access or do you need someone to commit this for you? http://reviews.llvm.org/D16044 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
