cchen marked 2 inline comments as done.
cchen added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp:2953-2954
+ (!(isOpenMPTargetExecutionDirective(DKind) && Res &&
+ (*Res == OMPDeclareTargetDeclAttr::MT_Link ||
+ *Res == OMPDeclareTargetDeclAttr::MT_To)))) {
+ // Only check for data-mapping attribute and is_device_ptr here
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> ABataev wrote:
> > Why comparing the value of `*Res` here if just comparing against all
> > possible values? This condition is always `true` if `Res` is true. I don't
> > think we need to map variables with `to` mapping.
> Do we need to map `declare target to` vars at all?
I don't understand this since spec says that
```
each variable referenced in the construct that does not have a predetermined
data-sharing attribute and does not appear in a to or link clause on a declare
target directive must be listed in a data-mapping attribute clause, a
data-sharing attribute clause (including a data-sharing attribute clause on a
combined construct where target is one of the constituent constructs), or an
is_device_ptr clause.
```
So, I think I should check both to and link.
Or are you saying that to clause is impossible to happen here since we have a
"Skip internally declared static variables" check so that if there is a to
clause, it will return before hitting Line 2952. Therefore, we should only
check for link clause?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69204/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69204
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
