nridge marked an inline comment as done. nridge added a comment. In D67536#1691107 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67536#1691107>, @hokein wrote:
> Could you add tests for this? Certainly, I just wanted to discuss the general approach first, as it will affect what the tests look like. ================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/SemanticHighlighting.cpp:152 + // Don't bother computing the offset for the end of the line, just use + // zero. The client will treat this highlighting kind specially, and + // highlight the entire line visually (i.e. not just to where the text ---------------- hokein wrote: > This seems too couple with VSCode client, I would prefer to calculate the > range of the line and return to the client. > > Is there any big differences in VSCode between highlighting with the > `isWholeLine` and highlighting with the range of the line? I took some screenshots to illustrate to difference. Highlighting only to the end of the line of text: {F10158508} Highlighting the whole line: {F10158515} I think the first one looks pretty bad, and is inconsistent with existing practice. Note also that the suggestion is not to special-case the VSCode client specifically; it's to special-case one particular highlighting, which any client can implement. If this special-casing is really unpalatable, we could instead try this suggestion by @sammccall: > Failing that, I'd suggest encoding a list of line-styles on > SemanticHighlightingInformation, that should be combined with any tokens on > that line. I guess one consideration when evaluating these options is, do we expect to use that "list of line-styles" for anything else in the future? I can't think of anything at the moment, but perhaps there are other uses for it. If not, we could do something slightly simpler, and add a single `isInactive` flag to `SemanticHighlightingInformation`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D67536/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D67536 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits