hans added a comment. In D66765#1645726 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66765#1645726>, @Szelethus wrote:
> Please note that LLVM 9.0.0-final is due on the 28th of August. There are still a lot of open bugs, so it will probably slip at least a little. ================ Comment at: clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:237-238 + +- New package: 'apiModeling.llvm' contains modeling checkers to improve the + accuracy of reports on LLVM's codebase. + ---------------- NoQ wrote: > NoQ wrote: > > "On LLVM's **own** codebase" :) > > > > @Charusso: I think we need to cherry-pick all of our latest patches to this > > checker to 9.0 because otherwise it'll be crashing with the > > `isValidBaseClass()` assertion. > >>! In D66765#1645726, @Szelethus wrote: > > Please note that LLVM 9.0.0-final is due on the 28th of August. > > Mmm, most likely too late. "all of our latest patches" sounds like a lot, so yeah probably too late. If it's broken, maybe don't point it out in the release notes. Fixes can go in 9.0.1. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D66765/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D66765 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
