alexfh added inline comments. ================ Comment at: clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProTypeMemberInitCheck.cpp:206 @@ +205,3 @@ + // Do not propose fixes in macros since we cannot place them correctly. + if (Ctor->getLocStart().isMacroID()) + return; ---------------- IIUC what this is doing, the offset should be `0` instead of `Field->getName().size()`. I've tried `Lexer::getLocForEndOfToken(Field->getSourceRange().getEnd(), 0, *Result.SourceManager, Result.Context->getLangOpts())` and it seems to work fine on your tests.
================ Comment at: test/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-member-init.cpp:96 @@ +95,3 @@ +UNINITIALIZED_FIELD_IN_MACRO_BODY(F); +// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: warning: constructor does not initialize these built-in/pointer fields: F +UNINITIALIZED_FIELD_IN_MACRO_BODY(G); ---------------- We also need to check that the macro definition stays the same. The lack of CHECK-FIXES doesn't ensure the fix wasn't applied (probably, it should, but that's another story). http://reviews.llvm.org/D16517 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits