On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 5:07 PM Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:18:49AM +0000, Eric Christopher via cfe-commits > wrote: > > Mostly that you didn't mention it in your commit message. > > > > I'd rather prefer the rest of the file be changed to match the __ rather > > than the other way around :) > > Depends. If it is a macro, not using __ is fine. If it is an inline > function, it *must* use the protected namespace, since an application can > #define a fancy junk here. > > Yep. Which is why I'd prefer the rest of the file changed to match the __. I was just trying to get Katya to do it :) -eric
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
