aaron.ballman added a comment. In D64666#1596619 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64666#1596619>, @xbolva00 wrote:
> I think @jfb wanted to say that if we know we always lose the precision, we > should warn even without -Wxyz, no? Oh, good catch! I hadn't noticed that *both* diagnostics were `DefaultIgnore`. I can't think of a reason why we'd want the constant-checked version off by default because it seems like there's no way to have a false positive there. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D64666/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D64666 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
