xbolva00 added inline comments.
================ Comment at: libcxx/include/bit:211 + ? __t + : (__t << (__cnt % __dig)) | (__t >> (__dig - (__cnt % __dig))); +} ---------------- mclow.lists wrote: > Quuxplusone wrote: > > No sane compiler would actually generate three `mod` operations for the > > three instances of repeated subexpression `__cnt % __dig`, would they? > At `-O0`? Sure it would. Hoist it? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D51262/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D51262 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
