hliao added a comment. In D63335#1543854 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63335#1543854>, @tra wrote:
> In D63335#1543845 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63335#1543845>, @hliao wrote: > > > it's requested from debugger people. they don't want to the host-side stub > > could match the device-side kernel function name. the previous scheme > > cannot prevent that. > > > I understand that you want a different name for the stub. My question is why > the ".stub" suffix was not sufficient and how does having a prefix instead > helps? Making the name un-demangleable is undesirable, IMO. There should be a > good reason to justify it. it's based on debugger people told me, with ".stub", the debugger still could find it match the original device kernel even though it could find both of them. But, they want to match the original one only and leave the stub one intentionally unmatched. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D63335/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D63335 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
