efriedma added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/Sema/address_spaces.c:12
{
- _AS2 *x;// expected-warning {{type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'}}
+ _AS2 *x;// expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'x'}}
_AS1 float * _AS2 *B;
----------------
xbolva00 wrote:
> I think this is an acceptable change..
This is scary. gcc and clang both parse `void f() { __attribute((aligned)) *x;
}` etc. as a declaration; I don't think we want to change that, even if that
usage is a bit dubious in modern C. And it's not clear to me if there are
other implications here; does this affect the handling of statement/declaration
ambiguity in C++?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63260/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63260
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
