gribozavr added a comment. > c++98 coverage is a rather niche thing there days. I believe, someone with > genuine need for C++98 support can work on that.
+1, that's exactly the reason why I skipped 98. C++98 is 21 years old now (or 16 if you count from C++03). Most projects that build with a modern toolchain and care about code quality enough to run static analysis tools have migrated to C++11. Many ClangTidy checkers have not even been tested *ever* on 98, many (`modernize-*`) don't apply in 98. We wouldn't refuse patches to annotate tests with C++98 support or fix bugs in C++98 mode, but I believe as far as ClangTidy is concerned C++98 is a niche use case, so I personally find it difficult to justify spending my time on it. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62125/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D62125 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
