steveire added a comment.
In D61835#1504663 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61835#1504663>, @aaron.ballman
wrote:
> I'm not certain where you're planning to go with this change (or is this the
> only change you're trying to make in this area?), so it's a bit hard to
> evaluate this patch. Can you explain a bit more about what you're ultimately
> trying to accomplish?
>
> It might help if I had a better idea of which APIs you thought were ones that
> would help users (because my only real concern with this change is that the
> public interface for this class is rather unpleasant).
The reason the `ASTDumper` class still exists (for the purpose of dumping an
AST to stream at least) is that it dumps the `{Function,Var,Class}TemplateDecl`
'correctly'.
The users of the follow-up patch
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61837#change-x5mxz9Lpijjs need that 'correctness',
but also need the public API from `ASTNodeTraverser` on the instance. (That
patch also extends the public API for users).
Perhaps some day the stream-dump output can be changed and the `ASTDumper`
class will not be needed anymore. This is not that day :).
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61835/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61835
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
