lebedev.ri added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lib/AST/StmtOpenMP.cpp:40 + if (auto *LD = dyn_cast<OMPLoopDirective>(this)) + return LD->getBody(); + return getInnermostCapturedStmt()->getCapturedStmt(); ---------------- riccibruno wrote: > lebedev.ri wrote: > > @riccibruno > > `getBody()` exists in `const`-only variant > > `getInnermostCapturedStmt()` does exist in both the `const` and non-`const` > > variants, > > but the `const` variant does `const_cast` and defers to non-`const` variant. > > `getCapturedStmt()` is good though. > > > > So at best i can add > > ``` > > Stmt *getStructuredBlock() { > > return const_cast<Stmt *>(const_cast<OMPExecutableDirective > > *>(this)->getStructuredBlock()); > > } > > ``` > > I'm not sure it's worth it? > Or perhaps something like the following to avoid one `const_cast`: > > ``` > Stmt *getStructuredBlock() { > const OMPExecutableDirective *ConstThis = this; > return const_cast<Stmt *>(ConstThis->getStructuredBlock()); > } > ``` > > My point is that in itself this is a minor thing, but not defining > consistently both versions (when appropriate) inevitably leads to annoying > errors. For example suppose that you only define the const version of > `getStructuredBlock()`, and then there is some random function `bar` with the > signature `void bar(Stmt *S)`. > > You then try: > ``` > // Intentionally not `const Stmt *` since we will set some random flag in S. > void bar(Stmt *S); > > // Non-const since we are modifying it. > OMPExecutableDirective *OED = something; > bar(OED->getStructuredBlock()) > ``` > > which fails because `OED->getStructuredBlock()` has type `const Stmt*`, even > though every other pointee type is non-const qualified. > > So unless it is intentional to forbid modifying the statement returned by > `getStructuredBlock()`, defining both versions of `getStructuredBlock()` > avoid this problem. Yes it is annoying to have to define the two versions but > as far as I know this is inherent to C++ unfortunately. Hmm, okay, will add during next update / before landing, whichever happens next. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits