smeenai added a comment.

In D58284#1399446 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58284#1399446>, @lebedev.ri wrote:

> In D58284#1399443 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58284#1399443>, @smeenai wrote:
>
> > CC @lebedev.ri, since I believe you raised some issues during the 
> > corresponding LLVM change but those were addressed.
>
>
> Yeah, i don't think i have any comments here.
>  The logic to pick the default of `LLVM_ENABLE_IDE` (based on the existence 
> of `CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES`) seems hacky,
>  but it indeed does not currently detect QtCreator's CMake integration as 
> "IDE", so i don't have any additional concerns,
>  this looks like a straight-forward cleanup.
>
> What i do have concerns about, is that `LLVM_ENABLE_IDE` is not documented in 
> https://llvm.org/docs/CMake.html


Good point. Added documentation in D58286 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58286>.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D58284/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D58284



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to