sammccall added a comment. In D58275#1399195 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58275#1399195>, @hokein wrote:
> The code looks good. For this protocol extension, we need supports from other > LSP clients, I think we may want to propose this extension to the LSP > specification, so that all LSP servers/clients respect it. My reading of https://github.com/Microsoft/language-server-protocol/issues/376 is that they may only accept a proposal that comes with patches to Microsoft's implementations. I'm not likely to work on that soon (it doesn't directly get us closer to interop goals) so my preferred path is implement and document the extension, get some support from other language clients/servers, and then push again for standardization. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D58275/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D58275 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
