tlively added a comment. In D57874#1391116 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57874#1391116>, @tlively wrote:
> In D57874#1389953 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57874#1389953>, @aheejin wrote: > > > - `-matomics` means `-mthread-model posix` > > > Why should this be the case? Atomic instructions are necessary for > multithreading, but I wouldn't think multithreading would be necessary for > atomic instructions. Certainly atomics are not very useful in a single > threaded context, but that doesn't seem like a strong enough reason to > implicitly opt in to the rest of multithreading when -matomics is provided by > itself. Sorry, missed previous discussion. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D57874/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D57874 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
