aaron.ballman added a comment.

Do we have any test coverage for this change? IIRC, this was one we couldn't 
figure out how to trigger?



================
Comment at: lib/AST/ASTDumper.cpp:637
+  if (!D->param_begin() && D->getNumParams())
+    OS << " <<NULL params x " << D->getNumParams() << ">>";
+
----------------
Extra whitespace at the start of the string literal, or is that intentional? 
Also, do we want to standardize on `<<<NULL>>>` with three brackets instead of 
two?


================
Comment at: lib/AST/ASTDumper.cpp:642
 
-  if (!D->param_begin() && D->getNumParams())
-    dumpChild([=] { OS << "<<NULL params x " << D->getNumParams() << ">>"; });
-  else
-    for (const ParmVarDecl *Parameter : D->parameters())
+  if (D->param_begin() || !D->getNumParams())
+    for (const auto *Parameter : D->parameters())
----------------
You can drop `getNumParams()` here -- if `param_begin()` returns a non-null 
value, `getNumParams()` must return a non-zero value.

(`param_begin()` is implemented in terms of `parameters()`, which calls 
`getNumParams()` when setting up the returned `ArrayRef`.)


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D56753/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D56753



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to