Sorry, but I fail to see where in AddMIPSTargetArgs the -G options are handled? What is the general idea about the "new style" cleanup?
-Dimitry > On 14 Jan 2016, at 18:13, Daniel Sanders <daniel.sand...@imgtec.com> wrote: > > Did you get an answer to this question? I think it's just that the FreeBSD > class hasn't refactored to that style yet. > That switch statement is getting quite large so it would be a nice cleanup to > switch to that style. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: cfe-commits [mailto:cfe-commits-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf >> Of Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits >> Sent: 27 December 2015 11:59 >> To: cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org >> Subject: Re: r256468 - On {mips, mipsel, mips64, mips64el}-freebsd, we need >> to pass any -G option to the assembler. >> >> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 10:36:44AM -0000, Dimitry Andric via cfe-commits >> wrote: >>> Author: dim >>> Date: Sun Dec 27 04:36:44 2015 >>> New Revision: 256468 >>> >>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=256468&view=rev >>> Log: >>> On {mips,mipsel,mips64,mips64el}-freebsd, we need to pass any -G option >> to the assembler. >> >> Why is this reinventing the wheel and not using AddMIPSTargetArgs? >> >> Joerg >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
