Did you get an answer to this question? I think it's just that the FreeBSD class hasn't refactored to that style yet. That switch statement is getting quite large so it would be a nice cleanup to switch to that style.
> -----Original Message----- > From: cfe-commits [mailto:cfe-commits-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf > Of Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits > Sent: 27 December 2015 11:59 > To: cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > Subject: Re: r256468 - On {mips, mipsel, mips64, mips64el}-freebsd, we need > to pass any -G option to the assembler. > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 10:36:44AM -0000, Dimitry Andric via cfe-commits > wrote: > > Author: dim > > Date: Sun Dec 27 04:36:44 2015 > > New Revision: 256468 > > > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=256468&view=rev > > Log: > > On {mips,mipsel,mips64,mips64el}-freebsd, we need to pass any -G option > to the assembler. > > Why is this reinventing the wheel and not using AddMIPSTargetArgs? > > Joerg > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
