lebedev.ri added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52670#1268347, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52670#1268170, @lebedev.ri wrote: > > > - Apply minor wording nits. > > - For `cert-dcl16-c`, **only** consider `L`, `LL` suffixes, not > > **anything** else (not even `llu`). > > > I'll find out about the DCL16-C recommendation, as I suspect the intent is to > cover `lu` and `llu` but not `ul` and `ull`. I agree, i've thought so too. That will open an interesting question: in `lu`, `l` should be upper-case. What about `u`? We can't keep it as-is. We will either consistently upper-case it, or consistently lower-case it. I.e. given `[lL][uU]`, should we *always* produce `Lu`, or `LU`? > I've pinged the authors Thank you. > and can hopefully get an answer quickly, but if not, I'm fine with fixing > that after the patch goes in. Thank you. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D52670 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
