ioeric added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51987#1231990, @ilya-biryukov wrote:
> > You beat it to me, but I thought we didn't use indexer as it could be > > confused with the actual indexing? > > Sorry. Not a big deal, can revert back if needed. > Mostly like indexer since it's shorter. Also not very confusing, since we > call the thing it produces an "index", so calling it an "indexer" seems fine. > > What's the index you're referring to? Building data structures for faster > search? Yes. The current symbol builder produces *symbol table*, which can be easily confused with an index. We might have a different tool that builds the symbol index structure (e.g. serialized dex), which might be a better candidate for the name "indexer". Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D51987 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
