klimek added inline comments.
================
Comment at: ../llvm/tools/clang/lib/Tooling/JSONCompilationDatabase.cpp:295
@@ +294,3 @@
+ if (CommandFound) {
+ ErrorMessage = "Multiple command and arguments found";
+ return false;
----------------
You're probably right. I guess people are not distributing clang tools (yet!),
so we probably don't need tools like cmake to output both at the same time.
What I meant with "preferred" is that we could allow specifying both, and then
we would use 'arguments', if specified, and otherwise fall back to 'command'.
Does that make sense?
================
Comment at: ../llvm/tools/clang/lib/Tooling/JSONCompilationDatabase.cpp:298-300
@@ +297,5 @@
+ }
+ for (auto& NextArgument : *SequenceString) {
+ SmallString<128> CommandStorage;
+ auto ValueString = dyn_cast<llvm::yaml::ScalarNode>(&NextArgument);
+
----------------
Thanks!
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10365
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
