================
Comment at: lib/Sema/DeclSpec.cpp:899
@@ +898,3 @@
+ if (Concept_specified) {
+ DiagID = diag::ext_duplicate_declspec;
+ PrevSpec = "concept";
----------------
hubert.reinterpretcast wrote:
> This is still just a warning without `-pedantic-errors`; I'm okay with it if
> Richard is.
This is consistent with how we treat other violations of the same rule; it
seems fine to me.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10528
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
