staniek added a comment. In https://phabricator.kde.org/D360#7068, @kossebau wrote:
> Issue in any case: this patch misses to also move the test app, > filedialogtester. > > Then I wonder if we could first come up with a definition what the purpose of > kowidgets and kowidgetutils is. And if perhaps we should split them up some > more or reshuffle together with other libs. > Especially would I like to see a split between QWidget things and non-gui > classes, so QtQuick solutions do not get trojan libs which come with QWidget > stuff. > > Other than that I would agree that KoFileDialog might be rather belong into > kowidgetutils, due to not having a dep on other stuff in the Calligra libs, > if that is the current difference between kowidgets and kowidgetutils. Yeah, not using kowidgets in Kexi is my top need. I try to avoid forking code even temporarily. It's enough that I forked bits of kdelibs4support. I see kowidgetutils like kexiutils: Tier 0. For now I don't care about dependency on QWidgets but one day an utils lib without QWidgets (Tier -1?) would be handy too. So I see you want me to update for the filedialogtester... PS: Quite similarly I'll try to make KIO optional in Kexi so one can add KIO support like a plugin. (that's a good dream) For now some places use local QFiles, some use urls. REPOSITORY rCALLIGRA Calligra REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D360 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: staniek, rempt, kossebau Cc: Calligra-Devel-list _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
