2015-06-15 12:55 GMT+02:00 Christophe Conil <christophe.co...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Jos, Jaroslaw and Alexander, > > First, thank you very much for the fast and kind answers! > I didn't knew about the possibility of the GPL to use the code in my > own executable, thanks for spotting that! I guess this solves my > question: I'm indeed not planning to redistribute the executable (at > least for now). > > As soon as I get a stable and clean implementation of the library, > I'll come back to you for integration purpose. Still, as you pointed > it, it probably makes sense to unify the licenses of the listed files. > > Attached you'll find the complete list of contributors who worked on > them. If you want, I can try to contact individually the developers > who worked on those files and > propose them an alternative license for a packaging into a library. In > this case, what should be the proposed license ? LGPLv2.1 or later? > > Thanks and best regards, > Christophe > > Additional note: I didn't receive the responses to my original mail, > since I was not part of the mailing list. I got lucky since I checked > the online archive. Is this a wanted behaviour? > It is normal behavior. Your original mail ended up in the moderation queue since you were not subscribed, I had to let it through. To receive mail sent to the list you must be subscribed. Or you could request that respondents always send you a copy when they reply. Cheers, Elvis > _______________________________________________ > calligra-devel mailing list > calligra-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel > >
_______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
