On 06/15/2015 09:03 AM, Alexander Potashev wrote:
2015-06-15 9:52 GMT+03:00 Jos van den Oever <jos.van.den.oe...@kogmbh.com>:
On 06/15/2015 08:44 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
Hi Christophe,
I find it awesome. As history shows our contribution model is largely
based on such cases.
Several things:
- as Jos has said unless the code is distributed, no changes have
(even in GPL) to be published; we're not using AGPL
- architectural: to encourage reuse we need to have a library, could
you list the files you're using?
- practical: if you list files that you need we can collect list of
persons that own the copyright
The list was attached to the previous mail. The paths are all in relative to
the sheets/ directory. The files contain copyrights like this:
Copyright (C) 1998-2002 The KSpread Team <calligra-devel@kde.org>
Copyright (C) 2010 Nokia Corporation and/or its subsidiary(-ies).
for f in $(cat /tmp/files.txt |cut -f 1 -d ' '); do grep copyright -i $f;
done|sort|uniq
Hi Jos,
More importantly, _all_ the files listed in files.txt are under GNU
Library GPL v2 only:
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public
License as published by the Free Software Foundation; only
version 2 of the License.
Does this mean we cannot relicense under e.g. LGPLv2.1?
Yes, it's not possible to relicense to LGPLv2.1 without approval of all
copyright holders. It's also not possible to change code under a
GPL2-only license to GPLv3 without approval of the copyright holders.
Cheers,
Jos
_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
