On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek <stan...@kde.org> wrote:
> On 4 February 2013 15:33, Inge Wallin <i...@lysator.liu.se> wrote: > > On Monday, February 04, 2013 10:00:05 Cyrille Berger wrote: > >> The conclusion on IRC was to reenable it for 2.6.1 (in two weeks). > > > > That sucks badly for Calligra Author since the only thing that we can > actually > > say that we bring to the table is ebook export. > > > > The filter was arbitrarily disabled due to a crash, then *not* reenabled > when > > the crash was fixed. The disabling was done by people who are not > involved in > > Author and I'm pretty sure the same is true for the IRC discussion. > > > > What I am - actually - a little bitter about is that the filter was just > > disabled without any discussion with me the very day before the tagging. > And > > now the IRC discussion, also without me, came to the conclusion that > it's not > > so important and that it can just wait two weeks. If you ask me, it > can't wait > > two weeks because half of the reason for Author 2.6 has just disappeared. > > I'd like to propose to give all maintainers the right to request > re-tagging if there's time when grave but easily fixable bug pops up > in her/his product. > > I agree on this. In this particular case the bug in question was not even marked a release blocker. > -- > regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek > Kexi & Calligra & KDE | http://calligra.org/kexi | http://kde.org > Qt Certified Specialist | http://qt-project.org > http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek > _______________________________________________ > calligra-devel mailing list > calligra-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel > -- My blog http://gkbhat.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
