On 4 February 2013 15:33, Inge Wallin <i...@lysator.liu.se> wrote: > On Monday, February 04, 2013 10:00:05 Cyrille Berger wrote: >> The conclusion on IRC was to reenable it for 2.6.1 (in two weeks). > > That sucks badly for Calligra Author since the only thing that we can actually > say that we bring to the table is ebook export. > > The filter was arbitrarily disabled due to a crash, then *not* reenabled when > the crash was fixed. The disabling was done by people who are not involved in > Author and I'm pretty sure the same is true for the IRC discussion. > > What I am - actually - a little bitter about is that the filter was just > disabled without any discussion with me the very day before the tagging. And > now the IRC discussion, also without me, came to the conclusion that it's not > so important and that it can just wait two weeks. If you ask me, it can't wait > two weeks because half of the reason for Author 2.6 has just disappeared.
I'd like to propose to give all maintainers the right to request re-tagging if there's time when grave but easily fixable bug pops up in her/his product. -- regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek Kexi & Calligra & KDE | http://calligra.org/kexi | http://kde.org Qt Certified Specialist | http://qt-project.org http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
