On 20 December 2012 13:14, Cyrille Berger Skott <cber...@cberger.net> wrote: > On Wednesday 19 Dec 2012, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> -- it's in KDElibs so for Qt-only libs we'd need a copy anyway > And now you see the problem of extremist position of "Qt-only" :) KDElibs > Framework 5 is designed on the idea of being extensions to Qt, copying those > extensions inside our own library is just silly.
It's not ideal but OTOH, the KMessageHandler isn't designed to be extensible for us. It's possible we would put our APIs (once tested) into KF5.x, but not before. Also, a there would be no point to push code used exclusively in Calligra into the KF. Let's have it cooked in our playground first... -- regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek Kexi & Calligra & KDE | http://calligra.org/kexi | http://kde.org Qt Certified Specialist | http://qt-project.org http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
