On Saturday 18 August 2012 Aug, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 18 August 2012 08:08, Cyrille Berger Skott <cber...@cberger.net> wrote: > > On Tuesday 07 Aug 2012, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > >> On Tuesday 07 August 2012 Aug, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Here is the suggested schedule for 2.6: > >> > > >> > September 7th alpha tagging > >> > September 28th branch+beta tagging > >> > October 19th RC tagging > >> > > >> > Release expected early November > >> > >> Right now, I'm having a bit of a difficulty planning because I need to get > >> Krita Sketch done by October as well. And there's the lut docker, which I > >> can only finish properly when lcms2 gets its next release, and then > >> there's the new opengl canvas... I don't say we won't be able to make > >> this, but I just want to register an advance warning that for Krita at > >> least, a purely time-based release is going to be difficult this time. > > Anyone else has an opinion on that ? > > > > As far as I am concerned, if the lut docker is not in 2.6, there is still > > 2.7 > > around the corner. Or are you thinking that with an extra month you will > > have > > time to finish all that ? > > I am fine with the proposal. My approach is that if some fix/feature > takes more time, I move it to subsequent release (thus I have extra > month+) while still looking for easier but priority tasks for the > upcoming release.
Yes, I know. It's a fine and beautiful theory. All I am asking for is some flexibility in practice now and then, and that's why I warned, in plenty of time, about possible issues. -- Boudewijn Rempt http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
